Skip to main content

Unlikely FW Election Scenario

Assuming he reads these blogs or one of them (how else could he come up with his conjecture), I think FW Mirror Columnist Bob Roegner, in his May 8th, 2015 column, thought I might be switching position numbers (which I won't be since my campaign finances wouldn't allow it anyway), because I have been slightly surprised that Commissioner Koppang might have an unopposed contest for an "open" seat, which is usually unheard of in politics, but the filing period deadline is still a week away, and I would be surprised if he didn't draw an opponent at all.  For all I know, I might even support Commissioner Koppang for Council, depending on if he gets an opponent or not, or who it turns out to be, and how the campaign draws out. 

By the way, I don't know why Roegner insists on using my first name in his column, since I have been using my middle name for politics since '06, and it has generally been my de facto first name all of my life, but as long as he chooses to do so, I wish he would stop shortening it to nickname form, which is something I rarely do myself and have never written it that way in a public format. 
 
Moreover, what in the world is Roegner talking about when he suggests that I should take his imagined election scenario (Mark vrs. Mark) seriously?  If I did switch, which I probably won't, why wouldn't I?  Why wouldn't I take any election seriously?  As if I consume all this time and energy for politics, including this blog, just so I can have the pleasure of being second fiddle and out on the sidelines.  Give me a break.

As for the aligning of candidates for positions, it could end up being a waste of city money for an "open" seat to have an unopposed candidate if it leaves an unneeded primary for a different seat which the city must pay for, but all candidates have free will to run in whatever position they want, of course.

For the record, I am the first challenger to announce for Position 1, not to mention the first official candidate for that position to file with the Public Disclosure Commission. 
 
Regarding my so-called Democratic ties that Roegner mentioned, whatever remains of them, they were pretty much all left in Alaska, where I was once the two-time Democratic nominee for the U.S. House of Representatives, but that has been 13 years in passing.  I am now with a new party, the Revived Citizens Party.  As most voters know, however, the Council is officially non-partisan.

-- Mark Greene, candidate for Federal Way City Council (Position 1)
 
[Originally posted on Council Run  on 5/8/15 as "Not Likely: Mark vrs. Mark;" revised on 5/11/15.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Globalist Folly

We tried to get by without ever mentioning Colin Kaepernick's name on our blogs or websites, but the fake news media is running with the ball, so to speak, so just to let them know that their, Kaepernick's  and LeBron James' propaganda doesn't work with the Revived Citizens Party, the RCP stands as follows: Starting with multimillionaire Kaepernick's decision last year to metaphorically thumb his nose at the National Anthem, "The Star Spangled Banner," and to sit on the bench or kneel on a knee while the Anthem was playing, because he thinks America has too many faults or something like that, he became the Pied Piper of disrespecting national symbols, particularly the Anthem, apparently until the country yields to whatever his particular idea of what a nation should be is.  However, even if Kaepernick's concerns do merit some kind of national rectification, which they may well indeed, when would our natio...

Smith's Votes

The following is a list of some of Congressman Adam Smith's worst votes in Congress:   1999:   Smith voted for Gramm, Leach, Bliley Act: the law that dismantled the Glass-Steagall Act which had separated financial institutions' commercial and investment branches from involvement with each other, and thereby kept customers' accounts from being exposed to risky banking gambits. 2008: Smith voted for U.S. - India Nuclear Agreement: this agreement undermined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act (N.P.T.), despite that this deal involves the energy sector, by cooperating on a nuclear level with a country that has long refused to sign the N.P.T. 2008: Smith voted for T.A.R.P., otherwise known as Wall Street Bailouts:  while Wall Street was giving their executives million dollar-plus bonuses, before and after the passage of T.A.R.P., the American taxpayer was footing the bill for this outlandish give-away of government money. 2011: Smith voted for...

Finally, A Thousand Pageviews, Plus an Old Controversial Election

The "Reliability" Blog is Growing Stronger and Just In Time for Primary Election   Reliability just got a thousand pageviews within a 30-day period for the first time as more people are becoming interested in the Washington Primary Election that's just around the corner.  The ballots will be mailed out in mid-July and the election results displayed on August 5.  I have a feeling that, finally, there will be a little redemption, through my electoral success this year, for the stolen 2004 Republican Primary, in which I was denied a rightful victory due to the incompetence of former Director of Elections in King County, Dean Logan.  I realize, of course, that it's not politically correct for politicians to complain about their election losses  -- you know, just let them steal it and say nothing -- but I'm not one for being quiet about wrongdoing in regards to our democracy, even if it appears self-serving, because i...